Tamil Nadu Civil Judge Mains 2023 Question Paper

Page 1 as text

Tamil Nadu Civil Judge (Main) Examination 2023 (TNPSC)

TAMIL NADU JUDICIAL SERVICE (TNPSC CIVIL JUDGE) MAINS

Tamil Nadu Civil Judge (Main) Examination 2023

(TNPSC)

TRANSLATION PAPER (Tamil and English Versions)

Duration: 3 Hours

Max. Marks: 100

The facts and particulars provided in the question paper, i.e. the court’s name, place, case

numbers and names of parties, are fictional. Yet candidates have to conclusively assume them

to be true for the purpose of solving the questions. The paper contains four Sections A, B, C

and D. Each section contains two questions; in total 8 questions, and all the questions should

be answered. Questions in Section A carry 20 marks each. Questions in Sections B, C and D

carry 10 marks each.

Section A (2 × 20 = 40)

1. Translate the following into Tamil:

1. We have heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties at length.

2. At the outset, it is required to be noted that the learned Trial Court, on appreciation of

evidence on record, specifically recorded findings on readiness and willingness on the part of

the Plaintiff to perform his part of the agreement. The findings recorded on readiness and

willingness on the part of the Plaintiff were on appreciation of the entire evidence on record.

In the legal notice which was issued on 20.11.2007, the Plaintiff asked the Defendant to

receive the balance amount and execute the sale deed. In reply to the legal notice, the

Defendant denied the execution of agreement to sell itself. That thereafter, the Plaintiff filed

the suit for specific performance in which it was specifically averred that he was ready and

willing to perform the agreement dated 13.03.2007. In his deposition, the Plaintiff

specifically stated that he was ready and willing to perform his obligations under the

agreement. He further stated that he approached the Defendant in the month of June, 2007

and again in July, 2007 with the balance sale consideration. There is no cross-examination in

this regard. The Plaintiff also examined two witnesses, PW-2 and PW-3, who were the

attestors to the agreement to sell dated 13.03.2007, who specifically stated that in July, 2007,

the Plaintiff approached the Defendants and asked them to accept the balance sale

consideration in cash; to that also there is no cross-examination. The receipt of Rs.3 lakhs by

way of earnest money has been held to be proved by both the courts below. Within a period

of one month from passing of the decree, the Plaintiff deposited the balance sale

consideration, i.e., Rs.9,74,000/- before the learned Trial Court.