Mains · descriptive
CG Civil Judge Mains 2014 Question Paper
Page 1 is free to read. Sign in to read the whole paper. All CG Civil Judge papers

Page 1 as text
Chhattisgarh Judicial Service Mains Examination 2014
CHHATTISGARH JUDICIAL SERVICE
2014 Mains Examination
Time: 3 hrs
Max. Marks: 100
1. Read the following carefully and write judgement after framing necessary issues:
[40]
The plaintiff Ram Naresh Yadav filed a suit for eviction and damages against the defendant Surjeet
Singh on 10.1.2013. According to plaintiff, he is owner of the suit house situated at village Silyari,
District Raipur and the defendant is his tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 500/- (Rs. Five hundred
only). However, despite notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act dated 7.9.2012,
the defendant did not vacate the suit premises. The defendant, while admitting the factum of
tenancy, denied the plaint averments inter alia on the ground that plaintiff’s son Somesh entered into
an agreement to sell the suit premises with him for a sale consideration of Rs. 65,000/- (Rs. Sixty
five thousand only) on 20.1.2001, out of which he has already paid him Rs. 59,000/- (Rs. Fifty nine
thousand only) on different dates, and after execution of the aforesaid agreement of sale, now he is
in its possession as owner/ prospective purchaser and not as tenant and the suit is liable to be
dismissed.
The plaintiff produced and proved Rent Note Ex. P1 dated 20.10.1999, legal notice Ex. P-2 dated
7.9.2012 and its acknowledgement Ex. P-3, whereas defendant produced the agreement of sale Ex.
D1 dated 20.1.2001 said to be executed between plaintiff’s son Somesh and him and one diary Ex.
D2 showing payments received by Somesh. Defendant also filed copy of legal notice sent by him
through his lawyer to the plaintiff claiming the suit premises in his possession in part performance
of the contract and not as a tenant, after execution of agreement of sale. Apart from document
evidence plaintiff examined himself as PW-1 whereas defendant examined himself as DW-1 as well
as plaintiff’s another son Rakesh as DW-2, in which he has given evidence corroborating the
agreement between defendant and Somesh.
(Note: C.G. Accommodation Control Act is not applicable on the subject matter of suit)
2. Read the following carefully and write judgement after framing the necessary charges.
On 10 March 2014, while returning back to his house sometime between 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. in the
evening, after dropping his brother to Raipur Airport, A was stopped by accused ‘B’ with an
unidentified person, who were armed with a pistol, and asked him to hand over his wristwatch