SC
Supreme Court Says IBC Appeal Limitation Runs from NCLAT Pronouncement, Not Certified-Copy Receipt
Nyaya Prep • Published • Updated • 3 min read

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for an appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code begins when the NCLAT pronounces its order, not when a certified copy is received.
Key developmentThe Supreme Court held that the limitation period for an appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code begins when the NCLAT pronounces its order, not when a certified copy is received.
Background and legal issue
The ruling addresses a recurring procedural issue for litigants challenging appellate insolvency orders before the Supreme Court. A delayed application for a certified copy can affect whether an appeal is within time.
Court’s reasoning and procedural position
The Court treated the statutory trigger as pronouncement and distinguished the availability of an authenticated copy from the event that starts the appeal clock. Parties must act promptly rather than assume that later receipt restarts time.
Legal consequence and next step
The decision places responsibility on litigants and counsel to track pronouncement dates and comply with the Code’s strict appellate limitation framework.
Legal framework: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016Relevant provisions: Section 62
Publication: 2026-10-14
Source: LiveLaw original report
- Insolvency Appeals
- SC
- 2026-10-14