HC

Rajasthan High Court Refuses Matrimonial Transfer Based Only on Wife's Financial Difficulty

Nyayavat • Published • Updated • 3 min read

Rajasthan High Court Refuses Matrimonial Transfer Based Only on Wife's Financial Difficulty
Illustrative image based on the legal development: Rajasthan High Court Refuses Matrimonial Transfer Based Only on Wife's Financial Difficulty · Generated for Nyayavat

The Rajasthan High Court has declined to transfer divorce proceedings from Alwar to Jaipur where the principal ground urged by the wife was the financial burden of travel.

Key development: The Rajasthan High Court refused to transfer divorce proceedings from Alwar to Jaipur merely because the wife said she lacked sufficient income to travel.

Background

The wife said she had no independent income and would find it difficult to attend hearings in Alwar. The husband disputed that Jaipur was her permanent residence and offered to bear her travel and related expenses.

Legal issue and Court's reasoning

Justice Chandra Prakash Shrimali found that the material did not clearly establish permanent residence in Jaipur. The Court also held that financial difficulty, standing alone, does not necessarily establish that a litigant is unable to travel, particularly where the opposite party is willing to reimburse the cost.

The transfer request was therefore rejected. The Court nevertheless adopted practical measures to reduce the burden of participation. It permitted the wife to appear through Nyay-Mitra, by video conferencing or in person.

Result and practical consequence

If she appears personally, she may move an appropriate application before the trial court seeking reimbursement of travel expenses from the husband.

Case: S v. T

Bench: Justice Chandra Prakash Shrimali

Advocates: Dhriti Sharma for the petitioner; Priyansha Gupta for the respondent.

Source: Read source report

  • Rajasthan High Court
  • Transfer Petition
  • Matrimonial Case
  • Video Conferencing
  • Travel Costs

More legal updates