HC
Jharkhand High Court Says Absence of FIR Does Not Discredit Cruelty Testimony
Nyaya Prep • Published • Updated • 3 min read

The Jharkhand High Court held that a wife’s account of matrimonial cruelty cannot be rejected merely because she did not file a police FIR.
Key development
The Jharkhand High Court held that a wife’s account of matrimonial cruelty cannot be rejected merely because she did not file a police FIR.
The Jharkhand High Court held that a wife’s account of matrimonial cruelty cannot be rejected merely because she did not file a police FIR.
Background
The appeal arose after a Family Court dismissed a divorce petition despite allegations of assault, abuse and expulsion from the matrimonial home. The husband had not contested the proceedings.
Legal issue and reasoning
The High Court emphasised that the absence of a criminal complaint is not, by itself, a reliable test of whether cruelty occurred. The evidence must be assessed on its own merits.
Consequence and next step
The decision requires matrimonial courts to evaluate testimony contextually rather than treat a missing FIR as a decisive contradiction.
Bench: Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad and Justice Sanjay Prasad
Act: Special Marriage Act, 1954; Family Courts Act, 1984
Section: Section 27 Special Marriage Act
Source: Original publisher report
Reported 12 October 2026. Underlying signed order not independently verified unless stated.
Act: Special Marriage Act, 1954; Family Courts Act, 1984
Section: Section 27 Special Marriage Act
Source: Original publisher report
Reported 12 October 2026. Underlying signed order not independently verified unless stated.
- Matrimonial Law and Evidence
- HC
- 12 October 2026