HC

Jammu and Kashmir High Court Acquits Two in NDPS Case Over Contradictory Recovery Evidence

Nyaya Prep • Published • Updated • 3 min read

Jammu and Kashmir High Court Acquits Two in NDPS Case Over Contradictory Recovery Evidence
Original Nyaya Prep editorial illustration: Jammu and Kashmir High Court Acquits Two in NDPS Case Over Contradictory Recovery Evidence · Nyaya Prep / original editorial illustration

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court acquitted two men convicted in an NDPS case after finding material contradictions about where the alleged contraband was recovered.

Key development
The convictions and ten-year sentences were set aside and both appellants acquitted.

Background

The prosecution said heroin was recovered during personal searches in the presence of an Executive Magistrate, but that Magistrate testified that the recovery was from the vehicle. The accused disputed proof of Section 50 compliance.

Legal issue and reasoning

Justice Sanjay Parihar held that the prosecution could not rely on the Magistrate’s presence while disregarding his contrary substantive testimony. A chemical report could not cure the failure to prove possession and lawful recovery.

Outcome and next step

The convictions and ten-year sentences were set aside and both appellants acquitted.

Case: Mohammad Shafi Lone and Another v Union Territory of J&K
Bench: Justice Sanjay Parihar
Advocates: S T Hussain and Nida Nazir for appellants; Mohsin S Qadiri and Maha Majeed for respondent
Act: Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Section: Sections 50 and 54
Original report: LiveLaw
  • NDPS Search Safeguards and Evidence
  • HC
  • 9 October 2026

More legal updates