HC
Andhra Pradesh High Court Denies Bar Licence Fee Refund for Suspension Caused by Missing NOC
Nyaya Prep • Published • Updated • 3 min read

The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a bar licence holder cannot recover proportionate licence fees for a suspension period caused by his own failure to produce the required local-authority No Objection Certificate.
Background and legal issue
The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a bar licence holder cannot recover proportionate licence fees for a suspension period caused by his own failure to produce the required local-authority No Objection Certificate. Chief Justice Lisa Gill and Justice Challa Gunaranjan set aside a Single Judge's refund direction. The licensee had undertaken to produce the NOC, sought additional time, and did not challenge the resulting suspension. His licence was restored only after the rules changed and he produced a trade licence. The Division Bench concluded that the State should not bear the financial consequence of a suspension attributable to the licensee's non-compliance.
Legal significance
The legal effect is confined to the judgment, order or procedural development reported here. Allegations and submissions are not treated as established facts unless expressly decided.
What follows
The parties, authorities or court will proceed according to the operative position described above.
Act: A.P. Excise (Grant of Licence of Selling by Bar and Conditions of Licence) Rules, 2005Section: Rule 6(V)
Source: Original report
Reported on 4 October 2026.
- Excise Licensing
- HC