HC
Allahabad High Court Applies Doctrine of Necessity to Principal Selection List
Nyaya Prep • Published • Updated • 3 min read

The Allahabad High Court upheld declaration of a principal-selection list by the chairperson of a recruitment board acting alone after all other board members had retired.
Justice Siddharth Nandan held that the doctrine of necessity is not confined to cases of bias.
Background and legal issue
The selection exercise had begun years earlier, and the absence of members threatened to prevent publication of results. Unsuccessful candidates challenged the list on the ground that the board’s ordinary quorum was not met.
Legal reasoning and context
Justice Siddharth Nandan held that the doctrine of necessity is not confined to cases of bias. It can prevent a public administrative exercise from becoming futile when no other competent decision-maker is available and the statute does not expressly prohibit the action.
Legal effect and next step
The Court sustained the result declaration and rejected the procedural challenge. The decision is tied to exceptional institutional circumstances, not a general permission to disregard quorum rules.
Act: U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Act, 1982; Rules, 1998
Section: Section 4; Regulation 4(6)
Publisher report: Read original report
Nyaya Prep report prepared on 10 October 2026. Party allegations are attributed as such; no unpublished finding is assumed.
- Administrative Law and Recruitment
- 10 October 2026