Supreme Court · 1998 INSC 437 · Decided 20 November 1998
Vjjayabal and ORS. v. Shrlram Tukaram and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1998 INSC 437 · [1998] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 54
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2814/1989
- Decided
- 20 November 1998
- Bench
- SUJATA V. MANOHAR, AJAY PRAKASH MISRA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC; Constitution Article 136
Headnote
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958: Sections 8(3) and 498. Tenancy laws-Tenant-Claim for stallls of-Determination a/­ Reopening of concluded matter-Proceedings for deletion of name of respondent No. I from the list of tenants-Compromise during proceedings­ lapse of 11 years Tahsildar re-opened the matter suo D motu under Section 498 and held respondent No. I was not tenant-On appeal Collector held compromise was under pressure and therefore respondent No. I was tenant-Collector's order unsuccessfully challenged before Tribunal and High
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)