Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 719 · Decided 24 October 2013
Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2013 INSC 719 · [2013] 11 S.C.R. 471
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 392/2008
- Decided
- 24 October 2013
- Bench
- S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA, A.K. SIKRI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Service Law: A B c Annual confidential Report - Adverse entry - Representation against - Rejection of - Second representation against the adverse entry after substantial lapse of time, after having exhausted all the departmental remedies unsuccessfully - Expunction of the remarks - 0 Restoration ground that second representation not permissible - Held: Second representation was not maintainable - It was against the Office Policy Instructions of the year 1962 and Standing Order of the year 1999 and also made after lapse of substantial time - E Restoration of adverse remarks was correct.
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)