Supreme Court · 2014 INSC 598 · Decided 4 September 2014
Vinay Kumar Shailendra v. Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2014 INSC 598 · [2014] 9 S.C.R. 510
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 8468/2014
- Decided
- 4 September 2014
- Bench
- T.S. THAKUR, V. GOPALA GOWDA, C. NAGAPPAN (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 226; NI Act Section 138
Headnote
C Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - s. 138 - Complaint under, for dishonour of cheque - Territorial jurisdiction upon the courts to take cognizance - Held: Courts should take the jurisdiction in cheque dishonour cases only if the drawee bank who dishonoured the cheque the o jurisdiction of the Court taking cognizance - On facts, issue of a notice from Delhi or deposit of cheque in a Delhi bank by the payee or receipt of the notice by the accused demanding payment in Delhi would not confer jurisdiction upon the Courts in Delhi. E In these appeals, the direction
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)