Supreme Court · 1998 INSC 66 · Decided 4 February 1998

Vimal Kumari v. State of Haryana and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1998 INSC 66 · [1998] 1 S.C.R. 658
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 4721/1996
Decided
4 February 1998
Bench
S. SAGHIR AHMAD, G.B. PATTANAIK (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 309

Headnote

Service Law : Haryana Social Welfare and Relief Organisation Service Group 'C' C Rules, 1983: Service Rules-Draft Rules-Not notified for about a decade-:--Nor the Government gave any expjanation for not doing so-Employee reverted on the basis of Draft rules-Validity of-Held: If there is clear to D such draft rules is permissible to meet any emergent situation-However, if there is no intention to enforce or notijj; the rules at all recourse to such rules cannot be taken-This is because such draft rules cannot be treated as rules made under Art. 309-Further, draft rules cannot legally

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)