Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 1054 · Decided 18 August 2009
Vijay Narayan Thatte & ORS. v. State of Maharashtra & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 1054 · [2009] 14 S.C.R. 891
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 5614/2009
- Decided
- 18 August 2009
- Bench
- MARKANDEY KATJU, A.K. GANGULY (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Land Acquisition Act Section 4, 6
Headnote
Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Sections 4, SA, 6 ...;. Notifications under Sections 4 and 6 A B c - Challenged by filing a writ petition - High Court quashing the Notification under Section 6 - Subsequently second notice under Section 6 was issued - Writ petition rejected by High Court - On Notification is time- D barred - The language of proviso to Section 6 is clear - Hence literal interpretation to be applied - In the impugned judgment no specific reference made in Clause (ii) to proviso to Section 6, there has b(!en general reference to Section 6 - Hence the observations in para
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)