Supreme Court · 2016 INSC 524 · Decided 13 July 2016
Velugubanti Hari Babu v. Parvathini Narasimha Rao & ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2016 INSC 524 · [2016] 3 S.C.R. 228
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 6198/2016
- Decided
- 13 July 2016
- Bench
- JASTI CHELAMESWAR, ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Arbitration Act Section 11
Headnote
F G H [2016] 3 S.C.R. 228 VELUGUBANTI HARi BABU v. PARVATHINI NARASIMHA RAO & ANR. (Civi I Appeal No.6198 of 20 I 6) JULY 13,2016 [J. CHELAMESWAR AND ABI-IAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: s. 11 - When an application u/s. 11 is filed, it is for the Chief Justice case, High Court ought to have decided the questions itse(f and given a finding as to whether the MoU dated 27.05.2013 was a vu/id and genuine document or it was a forged and fabricated document and then depending upon the findings, appropriate directions, if necessary, should have been passed
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)