Supreme Court · 1999 INSC 36 · Decided 3 February 1999
V.S. Palanichamy Cheitiar Firm v. C. Alagappan and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1999 INSC 36 · [1999] 1 S.C.R. 349
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 502/1999
- Decided
- 3 February 1999
- Bench
- S. SAGHIR AHMAD, D.P. WADHWA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Limitation Act Section 54; Specific Relief Act Section 16, 28
Headnote
B , Specific Relief Act-Sections 16, 28-Application for extension of time ,... Suit for specific perfonnance-Decree holder failing to deposit purchase money within the time limit fixed by court-Execution dismissed for want of c deposit of balance amount-Application for extension filed after five Court-Whether maintainable-Held, executing Court cmt entertain the ap- plication for extension-Further held, vendor can seek recission as a defence. Specific Relief Act-Section 28-Suit for specific relief decreed-Decree D holder Jailing to deposit balance consideration-No explanation for the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)