Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 837 · Decided 7 August 1996
V. L. Patil v. Arjun Halappa Naikawad! and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 837 · [1996] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 345
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 502/1988
- Decided
- 7 August 1996
- Bench
- M.M. PUNCHHI, K. VENKATASWAMI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Judicial stricu1res-£xpunction of Stlictures passed by High Court against appellant as all individual litigant and also as a Minister at that poillt of time and alleged to have influenced the decisioll making of the Land T1ibwzal-He/d, there is no evidence, direct or circ1a11sta11tial to which reflect the conduct of the appellant as a Minister are expunged from the Judgments at A B c all places wherever figuring-But the remarks collfined to his collduct as all individual litigant shall sustain-Expzmction of remarks cannot be sought by D a litigant if those were legitimately made
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)