Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 442 · Decided 5 July 2013
V. K. .BANSAL v. State of Haryana and ORS. ETC. ETC.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2013 INSC 442 · [2013] 7 S.C.R. 617
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 836/2013
- Decided
- 5 July 2013
- Bench
- T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Case Partly allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- CrPC Section 427, 482; NI Act Section 138
Headnote
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: A B s. 138 - Dishonour of Cheques - Conviction and c sentence - Plea for concurrent running of sentences - Held: Applying the principle of single transaction, the substantive sentences awarded to the appellant in each case relevant to the transactions with each concurrently - However, there is no reason to extend that concession to 0 transactions in which the borrowing company is different, no matter the appellant before the court is the promoter/Director of the said other companies also - Direction regarding concurrent running of sentence shall be
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)