Supreme Court · 2005 INSC 394 · Decided 1 September 2005
V.D. Chaudhary v. State of U.P. and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2005 INSC 394 · [2005] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 1095
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1115/2005
- Decided
- 1 September 2005
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, ARUN KUMAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 304A, 338, 304
Headnote
Code oJCriminal Procedure, 1973: Sections 438, 439-Bail-Cancel/ation of-Accused delaying and prolonging the case-Held: Case fit for cancellation of bail-However, Trial C court directed to complete trial in four months as the prosecution evidence was practically complete. Offence-Nature of offence charge-sheet. D A case was registered against the accused-respondent No. 2 under Section 304A and 338 IPC. After investigation, charge sheet was filed under Section 304 and 338 IPC. Accused was granted bail for offence under Section 304A, 338 IPC. He applied for bail for offence under Section 304
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)