Supreme Court · 2016 INSC 236 · Decided 2 March 2016
Uttam v. Saubhag Singh & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2016 INSC 236 · [2016] 2 S.C.R. 100
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2360/2016
- Decided
- 2 March 2016
- Bench
- KURIAN JOSEPH, R.F. NARIMAN (2-judge bench)
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Hindu Succession Act Section 6; Succession Act Section 6
Headnote
2 S.C.R. 100 UTT AM v SAUBHAG SINGH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 2360of2016) MARCH 02, 2016 [KURIAN JOSEPH AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.) Hindu Succession Act, 1956: s.6 (as a111ended) -Applicability of - Suit for partition de< ,,ed C in 2000 - A111end111ent to s. 6 111ade in 2005 would not govern that suit property was ancestral D property and that being a coparcener, he had a right by birth in the said property in accordance with the Mitakshara Law - Claim. of defendants that suit property was not ancestral property and that an earlier partition had taken place by which the plaintiff's
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)