Supreme Court · 1994 INSC 406 · Decided 20 September 1994
Union of India and ORS. v. Sayed Muzaffar Mir
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1994 INSC 406 · [1994] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 729
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2620/1994
- Decided
- 20 September 1994
- Bench
- KULDIP SINGH, B.L. HANSARIA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
Headnote
Service Law: Indian Railway Establishmen_t Code : Articles JBOJ(d) and 18Q2(b) Proviso. Voluntary retirement-Notice for -Employee under suspension during notice-{)isciplinary proceeding-Removal order passed after expiry of notice period-Held non-est in the eyes of law-Notice of premature period-Withholding pennission to retire or retention in service of D employee under suspension requires passing of an order to that effect by competent authority. · The respondent, a railway employee, gave three months notice on 22.7.1985 for seeking per-mature retirement as visualised
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)