Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 277 · Decided 23 April 2013
Union of India v. Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores LTD. and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2013 INSC 277 · [2013] 2 S.C.R. 1045
- Case number
- REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) No. 739/2012
- Decided
- 23 April 2013
- Bench
- P. SATHASIVAM, H.L. DATTU (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC; Constitution Article 137
Headnote
CONSTITUTION OF IND/A, 1950 C Art. 137 - Review Petition - Held: Review proceedings are not by way of an appeal; they have to be strictly confined to the scope and ambit of 0.47, r. 1 CPC - In the instant case, the error contemplated in the impugned judgment is is apparent on the face of the record, rather the dispute is wholly founded on interpretation and applicability of ss. 11(2) and 11(4) of MMDR Act - In review jurisdiction, mere disagreement with the view of the judgment cannot be the ground for invoking the same - However, the misquoted portion
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)