Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 1074 · Decided 18 September 1996

Union of India v. Mhathung Kithan and ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1996 INSC 1074 · [1996] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 486
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 12310/1996
Decided
18 September 1996
Bench
A.M. AHMADI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil

Headnote

INDIA v. MHATHUNG KITHAN AND ORS. SEPTEMBER 18, 1996 B [AM. AHMADI, CJ. AND SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J.) c Se1Vice Law: Indian Administrative Se1Vice (Cadre) Rules-Rule 5. Cadre allocation-Insider vacancy-Non-availability of Insider-Cany­ f01ward--Pennissibility of-Policy dated 30. 7. I984 due to non-availability of insider not a ground to accom- D modate insider in outsider vacancy in subsequent year. Respondent No. 1 was appointed to the Indian Administrative Ser­ vice and was allocated to a state different from his home State. There were two seats which were available for

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)