Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 1070 · Decided 18 September 1996

Union of India and ANR. v. Madhav S/0. Gajanan Chaubal and ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1996 INSC 1070 · [1996] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 503
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 12871/1996
Decided
18 September 1996
Bench
K. RAMASWAMY, FAIZAN UDDIN, G.B. PATTANAIK (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 14, 16(1), 16(4), 2

Headnote

B Service Law : Promotion-Reservation i1t-Single post-Rule of rotation and roster point-Tribunal holding that no reservation could be granted to the reserved • C candidates as it would amount to 100% reservation and therefore the promo- tion made was unconstitutional-On appeal held, even of rotation and the roster point to the vacancies that had arisen in the single point post and were sought to be filled up by candidates belonging to reserved categories at the point on which they are eligible to be considered such a rule is not violative of Art. D 16(1)-Constitution of India,

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)