Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 156 · Decided 20 March 2006

Union of India and ANR. v. Kankuben (Dead) BY LRS. and ORS. ETC. ETC.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2006 INSC 156 · [2006] 3 S.C.R. 48
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 10252/2003
Decided
20 March 2006
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT, TARUN CHATTERJEE (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 226, 227; Industrial Disputes Act Section 33

Headnote

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Section 33-C(2): Workmen-Application for recovery of over-time allowance--Claim C a/lowed/awarded by Labour Court--Challenge to--Dismissed by High Court-­ Letters Patent Appeals dismissed by the High Court holding that application for recovery of the claim 33-C (2) of the Act should necessarily be either pre-existing benefit or one flowing from a pre-existing right-Pre-existing D benefit/right differs from just and fair benefit/right- Former falls under the jurisdiction of Labour Court, and thus a Labour Court could exercise power under

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)