Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 568 · Decided 30 August 2006
Union of India and ANR. v. Ayub Ali
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 568 · [2006] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 634
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 8302/2003
- Decided
- 30 August 2006
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H. KAPADIA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution
Headnote
INDIA AND ANR. v. AYUBALI AUGUST 30, 2006 B (ARIJIT PASAYAT AND S.H. KAPADIA. JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950: C Article 226-Writ petition-Disputed questions of facts cannot be gone imo in Writ petition. Judicial discipline: Decision of one High Court, on identical issues, placed before earlier writ petition where some identical issues were considered. The respondent was a Class II Contractor registered with CPWD. The E authorities refused to grant revalidation of his enlistment on the ground that he had failed to obtain requisite marks. Feeling aggrieved, he filed Writ Petition
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)