Supreme Court · 2024 INSC 219 · Decided 15 March 2024
Union of India, Ministry of Law & Justice v. Justice (Retd) Raj Rahul Garg (Raj Rani Jain) and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2024 INSC 219 · [2024] 3 S.C.R. 848
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4272/2024
- Decided
- 15 March 2024
- Bench
- D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution
Headnote
Whether gap between the retirement of a District Judge and her subsequent appointment as the Judge of the High Court would constitute 'break in service' adversely affecting her benefits. The High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - s. 14, 15, Para 2, Part III of the First Schedule - Entitlement of High Court Judge promoted from District Judiciary to pension and retirement benefits despite break in service -
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)