Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 1129 · Decided 30 September 1996
U.P. State Roadways Transport CORPN., Lucknow Through Its General Manager v. Anwar Ahmed and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 1129 · [1996] SUPP. 7 S.C.R. 98
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 13119/1996
- Decided
- 30 September 1996
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Motor Vehicles Act Section 104
Headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: C Ss. 100 and 104-Grant of pennit in respect of notified area/route-- Scheme in respect of two nationalised routes notified-Private operators seeki11g temporwy pennits for a 11ew route carved out by fusi11g two notified routes--Held, 110 11ew route can be introduced by pennits can11ot be obtailled 011 the carved out route-This D device is impennissible to ellter i11to froze11 area or route or portion thereof through back door-The scheme is law by itself a11d u11til it is varied according to law no private operator has any right to camouflage a11y device
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)