Supreme Court · 1984 INSC 191 · Decided 11 October 1984
Tulsi Ram v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1984 INSC 191 · [1985] 1 S.C.R. 949
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3038/1983
- Decided
- 11 October 1984
- Bench
- O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, V. KHALID (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 136
Headnote
949 Prevention of Food Adulleration A.et, sections 13 (2) (as amended by Act of 1976) read with Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules 9A. scope of-lnterpreta· tion of Rules 9A. Words and Phrases : meaning of ihe word 0 immediate/y" in Rule 9A­ Whether delay of 18 days ln supplying of soya· bean oil-Prevention of Adulteration Rule 44(e) read with section 2(ia) (m). On the basis of the report of the Public Analyst that the sample of soya. bean oil purchased by the Food Inspector, Sorar on J7. 8. 79 from the shop of the accused petitioner was found
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)