Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 679 · Decided 29 September 2006
Tulsan v. Pyare Lal and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 679 · [2006] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 865
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4329/2006
- Decided
- 29 September 2006
- Bench
- S.B. SINHA, DALVEER BHANDARI (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 47
Headnote
B Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: s.47, Order 23, Rule I-Suit for declaration with regard to shares in property allocated in a consent decree passed in a suit for injunction-Held, C in view of provisions of s.47, subsequent suit is clearly barred-A consent decree remains valid unless it is set principles of estoppel would apply -A consent decree in terms of Order 2 3, r.1 need not be confined to relief prayed or subject matter of suit-It would be binding D on parties and on revenue authorities-Estoppel. Respondent no. I filed a suit against respondent no. 3 and the appellant, the wife
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)