Supreme Court · 2000 INSC 381 · Decided 8 August 2000

Triveni Engineering and Industries LTD. and ANR. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2000 INSC 381 · [2000] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 199
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 13357/1996
Decided
8 August 2000
Bench
S.S.M. QUADRI, SHIVARAJ V. PATIL (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Transfer of Property Act Section 3, 3(25)

Headnote

Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 : Section 3-Excise duty-Exigibility to-Twin condition-Turbo alterna­ tor-Held, to attract excise duty an article must satisfy the twin conditions of being (i) excisable goods and (ii) produced or manufactured in India-Turbo alternator does notfu!fil the.first be levied on it-Central Excise Tar({{ Act, 1985-Heading 85.02. Manufacturing process-Meaning of-Turbo alternator-Assessee pro­ duced turbo alternator by fixing a steam turbine on to an alternator perma­ nently placed on a pla(form at the customers premise:.~Held, when a market­

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)