Supreme Court · 1976 INSC 87 · Decided 29 March 1976

Tirlok Singh & CO. v. District Magistrate, Lucknow & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1976 INSC 87 · [1976] 3 S.C.R. 942
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 1093/1975
Decided
29 March 1976
Bench
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, V.R. KRISHNA IYER (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Rent Control Act

Headnote

Right to be . heard-Lawful occupant of a building has no right to be­ heard at tl1e stage of ''notifying the vacc!llcy'' bv the District Maoislrate b1.fore passing an order of allot1nent or 1elease-U.P. Urban Building~ (Regul~uion of Letting, Re111 and Eviction) Act, 13, 1972, S. 16 read with Rent and Eviction) Rules 1972- Scope of. Under section 12 of the U.P. Rent Act bo~h the landlord and the tenant ar'! required to intimate a vacancy to the Distr:ct Magistrate, as and when a vacancy is deemed to have occurred in the circumstances specified therein. ()n the in!i1n;1tion of a

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)