Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 1249 · Decided 19 November 2009

The State REP. BY Cbi, Hyderabad v. G. Prem Raj

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2009 INSC 1249 · [2009] 15 S.C.R. 1044
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 261/2007
Decided
19 November 2009
Bench
V.S. SIRPURKAR, DEEPAK VERMA (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
Prevention of Corruption Act Section 13(1)(d), 7

Headnote

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - ss. 13(1)(d) rlw s. 13(2); 7 and 20 - Demand and acceptance of illegal gratification - Prosecution for - Complaint for demand of bribe C - Trap arranged- Phenolphthalein test proved positive - Two independent witnesses proving acceptance of illegal court-Acquittal by High Court - High Court also directing reinstatement of the accused with all retiral benefits - On appeal, held: Acquittal not justified in D the facts of the case - The charge being uls. 7, presumption ul s. 20 could be raised - High Court acted beyond its jurisdiction in

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)