Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 465 · Decided 8 April 2009
The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India v. Vijay Krishna Neema & ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 465 · [2009] 5 S.C.R. 645
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 2242/2009
- Decided
- 8 April 2009
- Bench
- S.B. SINHA, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 136
Headnote
Service law: Clause 16 of Shastri Award -Absence from duty -Notice to employee to report for duty - Requirement of - Held: In case of absent employee, notice is required to be c served by registered post with acknowledgment due - On facts, there is nothing to show that the fact of employee was not known to employer- High Court ..- arrived at a finding offact that notice was not served upon him and since he had in his credit 236 days leave, he was entitled D to continuity of service - In the facts and circumstances of the case, interference under Article 136 of the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)