Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 121 · Decided 24 February 2006
The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board v. Subhash Chand and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 121 · [2006] 2 S.C.R. 640
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1271/2006
- Decided
- 24 February 2006
- Bench
- S.B. SINHA, P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(oo)(bb), 2(00)
Headnote
labour laws: Industrial Disputes Act, I947--Chapter V-A and Fifth Schedule­ C Termination of labour-Engaged during paddy seasons on contract-Held: Does not involve unfair labour practice. Words and phrases: Status· and 'privilege "-Meaning of-In the context of Clause (I 0) of D during paddy seasons on contract basis. On termination of his services, he raised industrial dispute. Labour Court held that the termination of service was invalid as the management took recourse to unfair E labour policy. Employer filed Writ Petition before High Court which was dismissed.
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)