Supreme Court · 1960 INSC 110 · Decided 6 May 1960
The Commissioner 0]' Income Tax, Bombay City I, Bombay v. M/S. Narsee Nagsee and CO., BOMBAY.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1960 INSC 110 · [1960] 3 S.C.R. 988
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 319/1958
- Decided
- 6 May 1960
- Bench
- S.K. DAS, J.L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Hindu Succession Act Section 14; Income Tax Act Section 13, 15; Succession Act
Headnote
v. Sher Singh Das Gttpta J. Ig60 May 6. 988 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] dJ.ughters in posses~ion, would not become full owners under s. 14. We do not think it would be proper to consider these questions in the present suit in this haphazard manner when on the all-important question of were in independent possession, on their own behalf. These and other questions of fact, and the questions of law that have to be considered in deciding a claim by tho first appellant or the other two appellants under s. 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, should properly be considered in any
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)