Supreme Court · 1964 INSC 26 · Decided 4 February 1964
Thansingh Nathmal and ORS. v. A.MAZID, Superintendent of Taxes
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1964 INSC 26 · [1964] 6 S.C.R. 654
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 86/1962
- Decided
- 4 February 1964
- Bench
- P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N. WANCHOO, K.C. DAS GUPTA, J.C. SHAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR (5-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 226, 132(3), 132
Headnote
v. Fida Hussain Salieb Mudholkar I. 1964 Ft!bruary, 4 654 SUPREME COURT REPORTS could not be effectively carried out by the landlord by part­ ing with possession in favour of the stail-holders by reason of which the performance by the landlords of their duties and obligations could and also >too<l in danger of having their licences revoked. Could, in such circum­ stances, the landlords have ever intended to part with pos­ session in· favour of the stall-holders and thus place them­ selves at the mercy of these people? We are, therefore, of the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)