Supreme Court · 2006 INSC 585 · Decided 7 September 2006
Tej Bahadur Ram v. State of U.P. and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2006 INSC 585 · [2006] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 793
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3976/2006
- Decided
- 7 September 2006
- Bench
- AR. LAKSHMANAN, TARUN CHATTERJEE (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 14, 16
Headnote
B labour laws: UP. State Electricity Board (Employees' Retirement) Regulations, 1975- c Regulation 2-Retirement age-Extension of-Sought for individual employee-Permissibility-Held: There is no discretion to the management to extend the age of retirement of individual employee. Appellant-employee the age of retirement so far as it related D rr to the appellant alone and a consequential relief to allow him to continue in serYice till the due date of superannuation age. High Court dismissed the Writ Petition. In appeal to this Court appellant contended that Regulation 2(a) of the E
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)