Supreme Court · 1994 INSC 332 · Decided 18 August 1994
Tarseem Kumar v. The Delhi Administration
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1994 INSC 332 · [1994] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 740
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 212/1981
- Decided
- 18 August 1994
- Bench
- G.N. RAY, N.P. SINGH (2-judge bench)
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- Evidence Act
Headnote
Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Sectio11 3. Murde'r--Circun1stantial Evidence-~irciunstances relied 011 : Dis­ closure of acc11sed to police-Reco1•e0• of dead body and i11crimi11ating articles from the ho11se in possession of accuse{f-Signs of draggi11g the body- · · F.J.tra of-Relevance of n1otive bf circunistantial evidence explained. D Section 27-Disclosure made by accused-Recovery of articles-Where E F prosecution produces stock witness,es to prove in1portant circunzstance Court should be cautious about the investigation done by police. The appellant
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)