Supreme Court · 2007 INSC 222 · Decided 27 February 2007
T. Vengama v. T. Dora Swamy Naidu and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2007 INSC 222 · [2007] 3 S.C.R. 348
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 274/2007
- Decided
- 27 February 2007
- Bench
- P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, V.S. SIRPURKAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 464, 423, 420134, 34; CrPC Section 156(3), 482
Headnote
-v. 1- T. DORA SWAMY NAIDU AND ORS. FEBRUARY 27, 2007 B [P.K. BALASUBRAMANY AN AND V.S. SIRPURKAR, JJ.) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: }' c s.482-FIR and consequent investigation cannot be quashed unless there is no offence spelt out from the same-On facts, FIR suggesting serious of offences complained of and, therefore, High Court could not have quashed D FIR as well as investigation-Penal Code, 1860-ss.464, 423, 420134. The case of appellant-complainant was that he had executed a General Power of Attorney (GPOA) in favour of first respondent in respect of his
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)