Supreme Court · 1994 INSC 385 · Decided 13 September 1994

Syndicate Bank and ANR. ETC. Etc v. SH. K. Umesh Nayak ETC. ETC.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
1994 INSC 385 · [1994] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 491
Case number
CIVIL APPEAL No. 2689/1989
Decided
13 September 1994
Bench
KULDIP SINGH, P.B. SAWANT, S. MOHAN, G.N. RAY, N.P. SINGH (5-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Civil
Acts & sections cited
Constitution Article 226

Headnote

A B Labour Law--lndustrial Disputes Act, 1947, Ss. 22, 23 and 24- Worker's entitlement to wages during strike period-Held, a/finning the view in T.S. Kelavala's case, to be entitled to wages for the strike-period, strike has C to be both legal and justified. Labour Law--lndustrial Disputes Act jurisdiction holding strike to be legal and justified-Held, these were issued to be decided by the industrial adjudicator under the Act and the D High Court exceeded its jurisdiction-Constitution of India, Article 226. In the Appeal by the State Bank of India the facts were that there were three

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)