Supreme Court · 1998 INSC 386 · Decided 8 October 1998
Sushma Suri ETC. ETC. v. GOVT. of National Capital Territory of Delhi and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1998 INSC 386 · [1998] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 187
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 3021/1997
- Decided
- 8 October 1998
- Bench
- M.M. PUNCHHI, K.T. THOMAS, S. RAJENDRA BABU (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Disposed off
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Constitution Article 233(2)
Headnote
A B Constitution of India, 1950: Article 233(2).,.-Delhi Higher Judicial Service-Appointment of-Eligibility-Officers from Delhi Judicial Service C or Advocate Pleader of not less than seven years standing-Public prosecutor/ Government Counsels/Standing Counsels of Corporation or Authority-Acting he is an advocate for the purpose of Article 233(2)-Thus entitled to be considered for appointment to Delhi Higher Judicial Service-Advocates Act, 1961; Section D 2(a)-Bar Council of India Rules: Rule 9. Service Law-Additional Government Advocate-More than seven years standing as an
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)