Supreme Court · 2020 INSC 106 · Decided 15 May 2018

Sushila Aggarwal & ORS. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2020 INSC 106 · [2018] 6 S.C.R. 825
Case number
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 7281/2017
Decided
15 May 2018
Bench
KURIAN JOSEPH, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, NAVIN SINHA (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Dismissed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
CrPC Section 438; Constitution

Headnote

Bail - Whether an anticipatory bail should be for a limited period of time - There are two divergent views: One are the line of Judgments in support that anticipatory bail should not be for a limited period and the others are that orders of limited duration - In the light of the conflicting views of the different Benches of varying strength, following questions referred to the larger Bench: (i) Whether the protection granted to a person u/s.438 Cr.P.C. should be limited to a fixed period so as to enable the person to surrender

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)