Supreme Court · 1989 INSC 342 · Decided 10 November 1989
Sushil Kumar Metha v. Gobind Ram Bohra
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1989 INSC 342 · [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 149
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 4599/1989
- Decided
- 10 November 1989
- Bench
- RANGANATH MISRA, P.B. SAWANT, K. RAMASWAMY (3-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- CPC Section 47; Constitution Article 227; Rent Control Act Section 13
Headnote
Haryana Urban Rent Control Act, 1973-Section 13-Controller has exclusive jurisdiction to order eviction Civil Court inherently lacks jurisdiction to entertain suit for eviction. Code of Civil Procedure 1908: Section II and 47 Order 9, Rule 13-Jurisdiction determination of-Court without had filed a suit before the Senior Sub Judge, against the appellant for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation of the shop, let out to him. The suit was decreed ex parte on October 20, 1977. The application under Order 9, Rule 13, C.P.C. to set aside the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)