Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 115 · Decided 20 February 2013

Sunil Mehta & ANR. v. State of Gujarat & ANR.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2013 INSC 115 · [2013] 2 S.C.R. 56
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 327/2013
Decided
20 February 2013
Bench
T.S. THAKUR, S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
CrPC Section 244, 246; Evidence Act Section 138, 3

Headnote

PRADESH AND ORS. v. CH. GANDHI [DIPAK MISRA, J.] compulsorily retired employee, if eligible to get pension under the Pension Rules, is not affected. Rule 9(vii) was only dealing with reduction or reversion but issuance of any other direction was not a part of it. It has come by way of by imposing the said punishment, regard being had to the nature of charges. It can be looked from another angle. The rule making authority has splitted Rule 9(vii) into two parts - one is harsher than the other, but, both are less severe than the other punishments, namely, compulsory

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)