Supreme Court · 2013 INSC 229 · Decided 9 April 2013

Sunil Kundu and ANR. v. State of Jharkhand

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2013 INSC 229 · [2013] 5 S.C.R. 924
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1073/2008
Decided
9 April 2013
Bench
AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI (2-judge bench)
Outcome
Appeal(s) allowed
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 302134

Headnote

Penal Code, 1860 - s. 302134 - Murder - Prosecution for - Conviction by Courts below - Held: In view of serious C lapses in the case, prosecution case not proved beyond reasonable doubt - Hence, the accused are liable to be acquitted. Criminal Jurisprudence - Prosecution must stand or fall 0 on its case beyond reasonable doubt, it cannot draw support from weakness of the defence case. Investigation - Defective investigation - Effect of - Held: Lapses and i"egularities in investigation, if they do not go to E ..,)he root of the matter, if they do not dislodge the substratum ' of

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)