Supreme Court · 2010 INSC 185 · Decided 31 March 2010
Sunderlal Kanaiyalal Bhatija v. State of Maharashtra and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2010 INSC 185 · [2010] 3 S.C.R. 1149
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1222/2006
- Decided
- 31 March 2010
- Bench
- MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, H.L. DATTU (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC Section 12, 15; Evidence Act Section 25; Arms Act Section 35(c)
Headnote
A B Evidence Act, 1872: s.25 - Confessional statement recorded in case relating to offences under the TADA Act would not be admissible in evidence against the accused in c prosecution for offence under any other law if the offences under any other law and those under the TADA Act are being accused convicted in TADA case on the basis of his confessional statement - In a separate complaint accused charged under ss302, 307, 353 and 402 0 /PC- Some offences under TADA Act were also incorporated initially but later same were dropped - Confession made by accused under TADA Act cannot
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)