Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 411 · Decided 26 March 2009
Sunder Kukreja & ORS. v. Mohan Lal Kukreja & ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 411 · [2009] 4 S.C.R. 1163
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 1910/2009
- Decided
- 26 March 2009
- Bench
- MARKANDEY KATJU, V.S. SIRPURKAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Arbitration Act Section 20
Headnote
. Arbitration Act, 1940- s. 20 -Application forappointment B of arbitrator- Objected to, by opposite party stating arbitration agreement did not su/,Jsist in view of retirement deed executed C by the applicant - Genuineness of the deed challenged by applicant - Forensic report that the deed was to arbitrator in view of the · retirement deed - The dispute between the parties had not • · become dead - Arbitrator appointed. D Appellant and respondent (two brothers) _were running a business. The rights and obligations thereof "' were governed by partnership
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)