Supreme Court · 1996 INSC 616 · Decided 2 May 1996
Sukhdeo v. THE.COMMISSIONER Amravati Division, Amravati and ANR.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 616 · [1996] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 287
- Case number
- CIVIL APPEAL No. 8805/1996
- Decided
- 2 May 1996
- Bench
- K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Civil
- Acts & sections cited
- Service Rules Section 65
Headnote
Service Law: Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982: Rule 65( I)(b)--Compuls01y retirement-;-Class Ill employee--Order of Govemment exercising power to compulsorily retire the employee who had not completed 55 years of age based on advm·e remarks-Held, the remarks A B c are diligence in making remarks-Controlling Officer before writing D adverse re111arks ~vould gi.ve p1ior sufficient oppo1tunity in w1iting by infonning the employee of the deficiency he noticed for improvement-Power exercised by Controlling Officer is per se illegal-Employee is entitled to
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)