Supreme Court · 2009 INSC 495 · Decided 15 April 2009

Suhelkhan Khudyarkhan & ANR. v. State of Maharashtra & ORS.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Citation
2009 INSC 495 · [2009] 5 S.C.R. 1142
Case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1039/2005
Decided
15 April 2009
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, P. SATHASIVAM (3-judge bench)
Outcome
Disposed off
Case type
Criminal
Acts & sections cited
IPC Section 268; CrPC Section 133; CPC Section 91

Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: c s. 133 - Scope of - Discussed - On facts, order of High Court directing removal of the encroachment does not suffer from infirmity so as to call for interference. D Appellants were tenants on the suit premises for 15- 20 years where and were running a religious bookshop. Municipal Council tried to remove the shop. Appellants filed civil suit. SOM issued a conditional order to remove the shop on the basis of complaint of respondent no.2. Appellants appeared E before SOM and requested for dismissal of application of

Search related judgments

Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)