Supreme Court · 2003 INSC 290 · Decided 9 May 2003
State Through Special Cell, New Delhi v. Navjot Sandhu @ Afshan Guru and ORS.
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Citation
- 2003 INSC 290 · [2003] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 130
- Case number
- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 725/2003
- Decided
- 9 May 2003
- Bench
- S.N. VARIAVA, BRIJESH KUMAR (2-judge bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Case type
- Criminal
- Acts & sections cited
- IPC; CrPC Section 397, 482; Constitution Article 227; Arms Act Section 25, 27
Headnote
Constitution of India, I950; Articles 226 and 227/Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; SS.397 and 482 /Prevention of Terrorism Act,2002; S.34: C Accused filed applications objecting use of 'intercepted conversation' as an evidence to prove charges under POTA-Dismissed by the Trial Court­ of India-Reversed by the High Court-Power of High Court to interfere with Interlocutory Order/Orders of the Courts below-Held: Since no appeal lies against an interlocutory order under POTA, by entertaining an appeal High D Court deprived respondent of an opportunity of canvassing on the
Judgments are the courts' own published copies, provided for study; they are not certified copies. Source: Indian Supreme Court & High Court Judgments, Dattam Labs (CC-BY-4.0)